Establishing common ground in empirical research on science teachers’ lesson planning competence: A scoping review
Artikel in Fachzeitschrift › Forschung › begutachtet
Publikationsdaten
Von | Leroy Großmann, Maren Koberstein-Schwarz, Daniel Scholl, Dirk Krüger, Anke Meisert |
Originalsprache | Englisch |
Erschienen in | Studies in Science Education |
Herausgeber (Verlag) | Taylor and Francis Ltd. |
ISSN | 0305-7267 |
DOI/Link | https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2024.2415246 |
Publikationsstatus | Online vorveröffentlicht – 10.2024 |
Although lesson planning is considered a crucial competence of
science teachers, research in this area remains limited. Currently,
there is a lack of both a comprehensive heuristic model describing
the necessary knowledge and skills for effective lesson planning
and an overview of the recently emerging research field consolidat-
ing current findings and suggesting future research directions. To
address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of N = 66 empiri-
cal studies (1987-2022) focusing on pre-service and in-service
science teachers’ lesson planning competence. Our analysis reveals
that most studies emphasise the identification of conceptual
knowledge, with less attention given to procedural knowledge or
skills in the lesson planning process. Additionally, while the majority
of studies examine the creation of mental or written lesson plans,
few consider the justification of planning decisions. A bibliographic
coupling analysis indicates that researchers in this field have yet to
establish a common theoretical foundation. To address this, we
present our findings within a modified version of the Refined
Consensus Model of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. This adapted
model aims to facilitate future research on lesson planning compe-
tence for both pre-service and in-service science teachers, provid-
ing a cohesive framework for understanding this critical aspect of
science education.